21 hours ago, sskkaa said:

Am pus ghilimelele de rigoare, cred/sper ca s-a inteles ce trebuie 🙂 Dar poate nu...

Era o parodie gen eterna si fascinanta Romanie, dar stiuatia nu e roza oricum. Tot e de sezon.

No comments...

https://luxury.carmagazine.tv/its-not-fair-mclaren-team-boss-accuses-red-bull-of-stealing-his-rear-tyre-temperature-control-mechan-quanglv/

Mi se pare corecta reactia lui @Dan_316i.

Pana la urma intrebarea fireasca, daca McLaren are bsi probabil ARE, exista ceva drepturi de autor pana si in F1..) dreptul sa foloseasca sistemul imbunatatit de franare si racire a gumelor si etrierilor?

Ma gandesc ca, cateva sezoane, trebuie sa ii fie recunoscut prestigiul.. mai apoi ar trebui sa elibereze dreptul ca si altii sa foloseasca eventual imbunatateasca ce au inovat ei..

Pana la urma dupa un timp si altii ar trebui sa se bucure de sistem.. desigur dupa ce primii isi asigura istoric si poarta laurii creatiei, pe buna-dreptate..

Pe undeva.. e normal ca si ceilalti sa doreasca, sa incerce, sa ajunga din urma McLaren.

 

Edited May 26, 20251 yr by bimmer90f30

Se pare ca nu exista drepturi de autor în F1.

La o căutare rapida pe google am gasit următorul rezumat:

, Formula 1 teams generally do not patent their innovations. Instead, they rely on trade secrets to protect their technology. The FIA, Formula 1's governing body, prohibits teams from patenting their advancements to ensure a level playing field and prevent monopolies

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQc-pW3QLuI

Not Ham fan, not McLaren boy fan(respectam istoria si cam atat), bravo lui Max pentru ce face in ciuda unui start de sezon super dezastros. 

Copyright isn’t really the relevant regime for a functional tyre-cooling/brake system; patents or design rights would be, and F1 teams tend to avoid patents because they must disclose the invention and because the technical regulations govern what is legal. So the key question isn’t who owns the idea but whether the system complies with the FIA rules. If it does, other teams catching up by copying a legal concept is ordinary F1 engineering; if it doesn’t, that’s a regulatory matter, not copyright.